Apple opposes judge’s order to hack San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

LOS ANGELES — Apple is opposing a judge’s order to help the FBI break into the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino, California, shooters, calling the directive “an overreach by the U.S. government.”

A public letter, signed by Apple CEO Tim Cook and published Tuesday, warns that complying with the order would entail building “a backdoor to the iPhone” — “something we consider too dangerous to create.”

“The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals,” the letter said.

Such a move would be an “unprecedented step,” threatening the security of Apple’s customers, it said.

“No reasonable person would find that acceptable.”

The letter called for a public discussion on the order, saying the company was “challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country.”

“We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications,” the letter said.

Passcode thwarts investigators

The standoff is the latest flashpoint in an intensifying debate between law enforcement and the tech industry over encryption.

A judge in California ordered Apple on Tuesday to help the FBI break into the phone of San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook.

Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, killed 14 people in the December shooting. The couple, radical Islamists who supported ISIS, later died in a shootout with police.

Investigators had obtained permission to retrieve data from the phone but had been unable to search the device as it had been locked with a user-generated numeric passcode.

Apple’s operating systems included an auto-erase function that, when enabled, would result in the information on the phone being permanently wiped after 10 failed attempts at inputting the passcode, the government wrote in documents seeking the order.

“We have made a solemn commitment to the victims and their families that we will leave no stone unturned as we gather as much information and evidence as possible. These victims and families deserve nothing less,” Eileen Decker, U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, said in a statement in response to the court order.

“The application filed today in federal court is another step — a potentially important step — in the process of learning everything we possibly can about the attack in San Bernardino.”

iPhone ‘backdoor’

Apple said the FBI had requested that the tech giant produce a new version of the iPhone operating system that circumvented key security features to install on Farook’s phone.

“In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession,” Cook’s letter said.

The FBI did not describe such a move as a “backdoor” into the iPhone, but complying with the request would “undeniably” create one, and limiting its use to the Farook case could not be guaranteed, the letter said.

“The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices,” it said.

“The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe,” the letter continued, adding it could find “no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack.”

Apple: Implications ‘chilling’

Apple, which has helped the FBI with similar requests in the past, said in the letter that it had “great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good.”

“We have no sympathy for terrorists,” it said, adding it did not oppose the order lightly.

But it said the FBI was proposing “an unprecedented use” of law dating from 1789 to justify an expansion of its authority, the implications of which were “chilling.”

“If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone’s device to capture their data,” it said.

“The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.”

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump gave his take on the standoff Wednesday, saying Apple should comply with the judge’s order.

“I agree 100% with the courts,” Trump said on “Fox and Friends.”

“I think security over all — we have to open it up, and we have to use our heads.”

8 comments

    • adrastus

      No, The FBI Does Not ‘Need’ The Info On Farook’s iPhone; This Is Entirely About The Precedent

      Over and over again as people keep talking about the Apple / FBI encryption stuff, I keep seeing the same line pop up. It’s something along the lines of “but the FBI needs to know what’s on that phone, so if Apple can help, why shouldn’t it.” Let’s debunk that myth. The FBI absolutely does not need to know what’s on that phone. It might not even care very much about what’s on that phone. As the Grugq ably explained last week, there’s almost certainly nothing of interest on the phone. As he notes, Farook destroyed his and his wife’s personal phones, indicating that if there were anything truly important, he would have destroyed the last phone too.

  • Michael Neils

    Hardly an overreach when they did what they did. Need to know if they had contacts/messages. etc in the phone for others to do the same if mission failed.

    • Tim Allen

      You must be joking. These are terrorists that the government is dealing with. Would you prefer that someone blow up your house and then not have access to that information? If you aren’t doing anything wrong in this country, then I could care less if the government wanted access to my phone.

  • SevatD

    Where’s the common sense here? These are terrorists, they are laughing at us stupid Americans caught up in all the political correctness and future privacy garbage. We won’t have to worry about any of the privacy issues when they are here committing more terrorism. If there’s a way to discover future terroristic plans, Apple should be bending over backwards to SAVE lives! What happened to the good ole days of when playing cops and robbers, the robbers never won! Sad world we live in now!

  • brumh

    Really Apple are you that shallow of a corporation ? What don’t you get about terrorism and protecting the US from terrorism. Have you heard of security and the concept of possibly stopping further acts of terrorism??? Can’t fix really stupid.

Comments are closed.