Watch live in NYC: Watch the Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Awards ceremony

Dad: ‘I had to pay $39.35 to hold my baby after he was born’

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

A new father says he was charged to hold his baby after his wife gave birth.

Reddit user “halfthrottle” posted an image of the hospital’s billing statement under the headline, “I had to pay $39.35 to hold my baby after he was born.” The photo has been viewed more than 2.6 million times in the past 24 hours.

The dad wrote, “The nurse let me hold the baby on my wife’s neck/chest. Even borrowed my camera to take a few pictures for us. Everyone involved in the process was great, and we had a positive experience. We just got a chuckle out of seeing that on the bill.”

Many Reddit users expressed disgust at the bill, but one user, “FiftySixer,” pointed out, “As a labor and delivery nurse, I can kind of explain this. I didn’t know that hospitals charged for it, but doing ‘skin to skin’ in the operating room requires an additional staff member to be present just to watch the baby. We used to take all babies to the nursery once the NICU team made sure everything was okay. ‘Skin to skin’ in the OR is a relatively new thing and requires a second Labor and Delivery RN to come in to the OR and make sure the baby is safe.”


  • sometimesarose

    And if we had real medical care, like the rest of the civilized world, this never would have been an issue. No billing statement, no “commercial insurance payment,” no “contractual allowance adjustment” – and no “Current Balance” either!

    • Suzanne

      So, you mean real medical care like Canada’s socialist healthcare? Prefect, Junior will be 2 before mom can get admitted to the hospital to to have him.
      Better still, how about Argentina’s socialist healthcare system? A model for all others!

Comments are closed.