Wisconsin judge refuses to halt recount, now 89% complete

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

MADISON -- A federal judge has refused to halt Wisconsin's presidential recount, meaning the almost-finished counting will continue statewide.

Two political groups that supported President-elect Donald Trump's campaign filed the lawsuit Dec. 1 as the recount began. The effort is now 89 percent completed, with little change to Mr. Trump's margin of victory.

"Everybody acknowledges there is virtually no chance" the recount will change the election result, U.S. District Judge James Peterson said. In a hearing that took only 20 minutes, he said he wasn't persuaded "by anything" the plaintiffs said.

Michael Morley, an attorney for Great America PAC and Stop Hillary PAC, wouldn't say if his clients planned to appeal the decision.

Mr. Trump defeated Democratic rival Hillary Clinton by 22,177 votes in the state. As of Friday afternoon, the recount added 609 votes to Clinton's total and 560 to Mr. Trump's -- changing the margin by just 49 votes.

Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein, who received 1 percent of the vote in Wisconsin, requested the recount to determine if election machines were hacked or tampered with. Stein must pay the full cost of the effort, estimated to be $3.9 million.

In refusing to grant the plaintiffs' request, Peterson noted the recount is nearly complete.

He called the lawsuit dead on arrival and said he would decide whether to dismiss the lawsuit outright within the next few days.

"We were pleased to see that the recount, as was discussed in court, is occurring smoothly, that there haven’t been any problems, and that’s a positive development for the voters of Wisconsin," said Morley, the plaintiffs' attorney.

Mike Haas, administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, said he was confident that all counties would finish by Tuesday's federal deadline.

"So, we're happy that there was not an additional complication thrown in at the end here," Haas said. "We're really in the home stretch."

Wisconsin is again the only state where a full recount is underway now that a judge has halted Michigan's efforts.

Michael White, a lead organizer for the Stein campaign, said he was not disappointed that the recount showed very little change in the election results.

"I’ve told our observers again and again and again, it’s not about who won. It’s about the process," White said. "We don't have anything to gain except ensuring election integrity."

Dane County, the largest county in the state to hand-count ballots, is likely to finish around noon Monday, Haas said.

He said that Outagamie County is "not as far ahead" as some other counties, but Haas said he still expected workers there to complete the recount by the 8 p.m. Tuesday deadline that the Elections Commission set for clerks.

The state must certify the recount results by the following day to ensure that Congress recognizes Wisconsin's 10 Electoral College members.

Asked if he saw a need to further challenge the recount results so far, the Stein campaign's White said, "I don't, but I don't have access to all the details yet. I've been scrambling to coordinate 3,000 volunteers on short notice.

Haas said the recount had value, and expected it to prove that there were no widespread problems with the election in Wisconsin.

"It’s been a huge inconvenience for clerks," Haas said of the recount. "It’s been a challenge. But, in the last five years, we’ve seen our state and local election officials step up to every challenge."


  • Stove

    Seriously. Just keep counting so that the workers can get their share of the crazy Jill Steins money. Don’t be giving any of it back.

  • Linda Ruth

    So in effect the Judge had already decided how he would rule and just went through the motions for twenty minutes I wish I could say it surprises me, but it doesn’t. Millions of dollars wasted just to gain Hilary Clinton 61 votes doesn’t that just make you completely sure of the election process, I know I feel safe as houses I can tell you.

    • Harold Hood

      “Safe as houses”?? What does that even mean? And Hillary did not gain 61 votes. The only fact close to this is that Stein gained 66 votes from the recount. But who needs a brain when you feel safe as houses?? ‘Murica!

  • confused

    So if there’s virtually no chance why bother, unless it is to prepare the box of 23, 000 hilary votes that will turn up.

  • JP

    “Judge James Peterson refused to grant their request Friday, noting the recount is nearly complete and there’s virtually no chance the recount will change the results of the election.”

    So then WHY IN THE HELL are we wasting time and money continuing to count?! Seriously?!?! How do you say something like that and then in the same breath, say that we should keep counting. Completely asinine. Ridiculous.

  • Tonto

    Judge, “you’re not persuaded”? Are you serious? You must be some kind of an idiot or are not looking at the numbers. You shouldn’t be a judge. Whoever appointed you made a big mistake. Wow, you are a real dandy. You’re suppose to be impartial. And you are not !!!! Pathetic.


    3.5 to 3.9 million for Wisconsin Great !! Wisconsin not doing very well,, Money truly needed, so lets take the money . The policies we have had for a number of years now has not help bring jobs or money into Wi. So great, take the money

  • liberty

    Peterson is just another Liberal puppet. So many around they come out everywhere like roaches. Another fan of “Hateful Hillary”.

  • Susanna Donovan

    Don’t kid yourself, they really are disappointed they didn’t find any Russian hackers in those Diebold machines, or in between the ballots.

  • SAD

    It’s a shame. Think about the difference that could have been made if the $3.9M was raised for children and families in need instead of funding a recount that changed the results by 49 votes.

  • SAD

    It’s a shame. Think about how the $3.9M could have helped children and families in need instead of funding a recount that changed the results by 49 votes.

  • George kircher

    I’m with Stove. Start a rumor that there has been a miscounted and let the libs donate another 4 million to Wisconsin’s economy. As long as they are willing to pay take the money. That’s less they have to spent else where. It’s a win win.

  • Michael

    I believe that Wisconsin law for recounts should be changed! It should be like Michigan’s law where you have to give a legit reason based on evidence for a recount rather than what Wisconsin has right now which is if you got the money we will do a recount. The Judge basically followed the law, and that law needs to be changed!

Comments are closed.