Flash flood watch for multiple counties Monday afternoon through Tuesday morning

Israel, Iran react to Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Benjamin Netanyahu

JERUSALEM (CNN) — His audience may have been U.S. politicians, but Israelis and Iranians also watched Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech Tuesday with great interest — for its possible effect on talks about Iran’s nuclear program as well as Israel’s March 17 election.

Greeted enthusiastically by the predominantly Republican politicians when he entered the U.S. House of Representatives chamber, Netanyahu saw his speech interrupted numerous times by fervent applause.

But the reaction back in the Middle East was hardly as universal, including in Israel.

Isaac Herzog — the Labor Party chairman vying to become Israel’s next Prime Minister following its election in two weeks — said that Netanyahu’s speech, “as impressive as it may be, did not prevent the Iranians’ nuclear program” nor did it impact talks now underway in Montreux, Switzerland, to address it.

What the speech did accomplish, according to Herzog, is “greatly undermine … the relationship between Israel and the United States,” whose leader President Barack Obama opposed Netanyahu’s speech as a political move that threatened to thwart the ongoing nuclear talks.

“It will not change the position of (Obama’s) administration and will only broaden the crisis of our great friend and our strategic ally,” Herzog said of the speech. “That price, we will have to pay.”

Iranian deadline, election date both loom

Like Herzog’s remarks — not surprising given that he’s made similar ones before — Netanyahu’s had plenty of zing but not a lot of surprises.

They came ahead of a March 24 deadline in which negotiators, including America’s top diplomat and his Iranian counterpart, are trying to reach a long-term deal about Iran’s nuclear program.

That looming date is why Netanyahu said he was compelled to address the U.S. Congress at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner (and without the advance knowledge of Obama). Prior to boarding a plane Sunday in Tel Aviv, the Prime Minister called his foray to Washington “a crucial trip, even a historical one.”

Yet the Iranian nuclear deadline isn’t the only one looming for Netanyahu, or even the most immediate one.

Because of Israeli elections in two weeks, the man who has called himself the “messenger of all the people of Israel” might not be that for much longer. While it happened some 6,000 miles away, his speech in Washington on Tuesday could sway hearts and minds back home — some admiring his strong leadership in protecting Israel and others like Herzog upset over how he has roiled relations with Obama and undermined peace efforts.

Nachshon Carmi said he is “totally” convinced Netanyahu primarily aimed speak to voters at home as much as to affect American government’s decisions on Iran.

“I think this is a classic move of distracting the voters from domestic issues to foreign policy,” Carmi said in Jerusalem.

Yet a fellow Israeli citizen, Malynnda Littky, disagrees. She thinks that Netanyahu had every right to make his case in Washington if he believes an Iranian deal could affect Israel’s future.

“He’s giving a speech on a topic he knows a lot about and is important to us,” Littky said. “But it’s still just a speech.”

Iranian minister: Netanyahu trying to disrupt nuclear talks

Given longstanding issues with the Palestinian territories and the fact that Israel is surrounded by nations with predominantly Muslim populations, Israeli leaders have ample experience with being isolated and on the defensive. They’ve also proven a willingness time and again to act out, if they feel doing so will safeguard their national security.

Iran has been a case in point.

Netanyahu has been the loudest voice in speaking about international efforts aimed at preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. If the rest of the world can’t act to stop this from happening, he’s suggested, then Israel will.

There’s precedent about how that might be done: Israel bombed Iraq’s nuclear reactor in 1981. At the time, then-Prime Minister Menachem Begin drew a line in the sand, essentially vowing that no Israeli enemy could develop weapons of mass destruction and that Israel would defend itself “with all the means at our disposal.”

That mentality is what appears to be driving Netanyahu, who has been adamant and consistent in expressing his distrust of Iran (whose supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, tweeted last year that Israel should be “annihilated.”) The Prime Minister has been just as forthright in challenging international efforts to strike a deal with Tehran, an effort that’s been accelerated since a more conciliatory Hassan Rouhani became Iran’s president in 2013.

Several interim agreements have been made in recent months, though a long-term pact so far has been elusive. The Switzerland talks aim to bridge “gaps” between the various parties, with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif telling CNN on Tuesday that “we’re starting to move forward, but it’s a lot of work.”

So is Netanyahu having a disruptive effect on these negotiations?

“He’s trying to,” Zarif said. “But I don’t think trying to create tension and conflict helps anybody.”

Iranians paying attention

One thing that Netanyahu has certainly done is get the attention of Iranians.

News about what’s happening in Washington was the biggest item Tuesday in Iranian media and high on the minds of people on the streets of Tehran.

While the speech wasn’t carried live in Tehran, those who talked to CNN’s Frederik Pleitgen in the Iranian capital said they intended to find out what the Israeli leader said.

There is a widespread opinion in Iran, whether based on fact or fiction, that Netanyahu has long been intent on going after Iran, even before he started his second stint as prime minister in 2009. His position is often conflated with that of the United States, a view that could only be exacerbated by the raucous reception Netanyahu got as he entered the chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives and the repeated applause he got during Tuesday’s speech.

Of course, just because Iranians are mindful of what Netanyahu said doesn’t mean they will change their minds.

In Israel, worries about U.S. relations

Changing minds in Israel, ahead of the coming election, is another matter.

Whether or not Tuesday’s speech will do that can’t be ascertained until there’s credible polling after his remarks, or arguably once citizens go to the polls in two weeks.

Until then, polls from various Israeli news outlets suggest a tight race. Some project Netanyahu’s Likud party winning fewer seats than the so-called Zionist alliance opposing him, though exactly who will end up as prime minister depends on which parties join forces after the votes are cast.

Most Israelis don’t think that Netanyahu has any hope of impacting opinions and policies out of Iran with his speech, Bar-Ilan University professor Eytan Gilboa said. But many are worried about what Gilboa calls the worst crisis in the decades-long relationship between Israeli and the United States, with Tuesday’s speech (which was set up without Obama’s knowledge) doing little to help change the perception “there is very little trust between” Obama and Netanyahu.

Speaking from Jerusalem, Carmi said he understands the depth of this division but doesn’t think the damage is irreparable.

“The connection between Israel and the United States goes so deep and is on so many levels,” he said. “Yes, we’re going through a bad time. But we’ll get over it.”


  • Ajax Lessome

    This deal does pave Iran’s path to a bomb. One variation of a deal being discussed would place at least a 10-year regime of strict controls on Iran’s uranium enrichment. If Iran complied, the restrictions would be gradually lifted over the final five years. One issue critics are certain to focus on: Once the deal expired, Iran could theoretically ramp up enrichment to whatever level it wanted . . In other words, we’re making bigger concessions to a regime, so they can keep their existing nuclear program in place for ten years — presuming they don’t cheat! — and then give them permission to bring it up to weapons-status shortly thereafter . . . and as we’re giving them this deal, they’re practicing blowing up our aircraft carriers. Are you kidding me? President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry go into these negotiations aiming to protect their legacy; the Iranians go into it aiming to protect their nuclear program.

    • Gloria

      You said it right. It is a pitiful situation that a black American president has racially disregarded disrespected and
      showed the world that Obama cares very little for the future of our nations. Now he wants a deal that will allow time
      “to do something if Iran cheats?” Really, get real already, this is not kindergarten at the play ground. I agree with
      P.M. Netanyahu, NO DEAL is better than a bad one. No centrifuges, no plutonium and all that other bad stuff,
      they need to turn it over to get a deal.

  • Gloria

    what is in this “deal” for our safety in the world? Why should we trust Pres Obama when he turns his back on Americas
    ally to deal with Iran? Grab a brain people, Mr Netanyahu is one of the smartest leaders in the world and he continues to be persecuted for his straight communication, why?.B Obama politicized B Netanyahu’s invitation. It
    could be said that it is strangely odd for this negotiations with Iran so close to the Israel elections?

    • Jess

      You should be the one who should grab a brain. You must be joking when you said Netanyahu’s one of the smartest leaders in the world because it’s because of him that we went into Iraq for WMDs that—surprise, surprise—never existed. It’s because of him that Americans dies in that war and Americans continued to die after since we’re stuck with the mess in Middle East.

Comments are closed.