Winter weather advisory issued for much of SE Wisconsin from 6 p.m. Friday – 9 a.m. Saturday
Impeachment trial of President Trump: How to watch it on TV and online with FOX6 News

Deadlocked U.S. Supreme Court deals big blow to Pres. Obama’s immigration plan

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON — In a crushing blow to the White House, the Supreme Court announced Thursday it was evenly divided in a case concerning President Barack Obama’s controversial executive actions on immigration.

The one-sentence ruling, issued without comment or dissent, means that the programs will remain blocked from going into effect, and the issue will return to the lower court. It is exceedingly unlikely the programs will go into effect for the remainder of the Obama presidency.

Data pix.

Obama, speaking at the White House, lamented the ruling.

"For more than two decades now our immigration system, everybody acknowledges, has been broken," Obama said. "And the fact that the Supreme Court wasn't able to issue a decision today doesn't just set the system back even further, it takes us further from the country that we aspire to be."

The ruling will impact the more than 4 million undocumented immigrants seeking to be able to come out of the shadows and apply for these programs to stay in the United States. Immediately after Obama announced them in late 2014, Texas and 25 other states challenged the plans and they were blocked nationwide by a federal district court the next year.

Immigration has already been a prominent and highly charged topic of the 2016 election already this year, and this ruling guarantees it will only be more so.

Data pix.

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton criticized the ruling, saying it is evidence not only of why the Supreme Court needs a ninth justice, but also that the delay of Obama's immigration programs adds importance to putting a Democrat in the White House to continue the fight to put them in place.

"Today's deadlocked decision from the Supreme Court is unacceptable, and show us all just how high the stakes are in this election," Clinton said in a statement Thursday morning. She later tweeted, calling it "heartbreaking."

Trump tweeted that the court "kept us safe" from amnesty and in a statement said the issue is key in November's election.

"The election, and the Supreme Court appointments that come with it will decide whether or not we have a border and, hence, a country. Clinton has pledged to expand Obama's executive amnesty, hurting poor African-American and Hispanic workers by giving away their jobs and federal resources to illegal immigrant labor -- while making us all less safe," he said.

The topic of undocumented immigrants has been a central theme this campaign. While Democrats have pushed for immigration reform and leniency to some people living in the country illegally, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump has spoken forcefully about deporting the millions of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. and disparaged Mexican immigrants during his campaign.

Hispanic Americans are also becoming an increasingly influential electoral demographic in key swing states that Democrats hope they can turn blue by painting Republicans as backward on immigration. Already liberal groups were putting out statements seeking to tie the Republican Party to Trump's comments in light of the ruling.

Obama used his statement to hit Trump as well, saying, "Immigration is not something to fear. We don't have to wall ourselves off from those who may not look like us right now or pray like we do or have a different last name because being an American is about something more than that."

Impact of Scalia's death

The 4-4 split on the court is also more evidence of the long shadow of Justice Antonin Scalia's death this February.

"This is a ruling that affects millions of American families, but because the Supreme Court does not have its full complement of nine justices, the court was unable to deliver a definitive ruling a case of such national importance." said Elizabeth Wydra, president of Constitutional Accountability Center.

While Scalia likely would have voted with the conservatives on the court against Obama, resulting in the same overall outcome of the policies remaining blocked, legal experts say the lack of a definitive answer is harmful to the courts.

"The resolution of the immigration case -- or lack thereof -- underscores how handicapped the Supreme Court can be when it's not fully staffed," said Steve Vladeck, CNN contributor and professor of law at American University Washington College of Law. "Although proponents of President Obama's immigration plan might prefer this result to a 5-4 loss, which would have set a nationwide precedent, rulings like these create uncertainty for the courts and the country going forward -- uncertainty that, at the end of the day, puts more pressure on the political branches and dilutes the role of the Supreme Court."

Congressional Republicans: 'Slap down' to Obama

Texas was supported at the Supreme Court by the GOP-led House of Representatives, who said that the programs went forward after the President failed in his attempts to persuade Congress to revise immigration laws.

"This is a slap down to the President," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, told CNN. "It shows there are limitations on the President's actions and the only way to resolve this problem is through the Congress."

"Today, Article I of the Constitution was vindicated," House Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement. "The Supreme Court's ruling makes the President's executive action on immigration null and void. The Constitution is clear: The president is not permitted to write laws -- only Congress is. This is another major victory in our fight to restore the separation of powers."

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called Obama's action "an unauthorized abuse of presidential power that trampled the Constitution." In a statement, he added, "as the President himself said, he is not a king who can unilaterally change and write immigration laws."

Legal limbo

Thursday's ruling essentially perpetuates indefinitely a legal limbo that undocumented immigrants who were potentially eligible for the program have been living since the first court ruling blocking the President's programs.

Millions had readied applications for the deferred action, only to enter a holding pattern as the court cases played out.

Thursday's ruling was not a final decision in the matter, it only continues an injunction preventing the programs from going into effect. The question of the constitutionality of the program still remains before the lower courts. The roughly 4 million undocumented Americans who were awaiting Thursday's decision find their situations largely unchanged, though the ruling guarantees their undecided status will continue likely through the end of Obama's presidency.

Vladeck said the undocumented immigrants do not face a serious threat of deportation. "But so long as the lower court's ruling remains intact, they also won't be able to take advantage of the benefits that the President's initiative was intended to provide," he said., an immigration advocacy group with roots in Silicon Valley, called the ruling a "devastating loss" for millions.

"Today is a very tough, disappointing day," President Todd Schulte said in a statement. "This morning, a few million United States citizens with undocumented parents, hundreds of thousands of DREAMers, and millions of their family and friends received devastating news. The hope that they would benefit from DAPA and expanded DACA and be able to live their lives in ways so many of us take for granted, such as driving to work without the fear that a broken taillight will end in our family being torn apart, remains out of reach."

Mi Familia Vota pledged to continue the political battle was well as the legal one, blaming Republicans for inaction.

"Let's be clear, our community will never forget that it was Republican elected officials and politicians who stood in the way of the well-being of our families and have blocked any solutions to fix our broken immigration system," Executive Director Ben Monterroso said in a statement. "While this is a setback in our fight, we are fully committed to find a fix to our broken immigration system through a comprehensive immigration reform with a pathway to citizenship. The solution is in the hands of our community, and we will demonstrate the power of our vote come November."

What Obama's plans do

The White House announced the programs in November 2014, issuing a five-page guidance memo enabling qualifying undocumented workers to receive temporary relief from the threat of deportation and to apply for programs that could qualify them for work authorization and associated benefits.

The Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) targets the nearly 4.3 million undocumented parents of citizens and lawful residents, and the second program expands the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), initiative aimed at non-citizens who came to the country as children.

"We'll bring more undocumented immigrants out of the shadows so they can play by the rules, pay their full share of taxes, pass a criminal background check and get right with the law," Obama told an audience in Nevada after the programs were announced.

The challengers -- mostly Republican governors and attorney generals -- said the unilateral actions were unconstitutional and they violated a federal law that sets forward how agencies can establish regulations.

In 2015 a federal judge sided with the states and blocked the programs from going forward. A divided federal appeals court later upheld the preliminary injunction.

Obama's lawyers argued in court papers that the lower court rulings threatened great harm, "not only to the proper role of federal courts and to federal immigration law, but also to millions of parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, aliens who are the lowest priorities for removal yet now work off the books to support their families."

As a threshold issue, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli said that the states didn't have the legal right to be in court, because the Constitution "assigns the formation of immigration policy exclusively to the National Government precisely because immigration is an inherently national matter."

He stressed that the guidance from the government does not provide any kind of lawful status under immigration law as the aliens remain removable at any time.

Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller argued that the states had standing to bring the challenge in part because DAPA would create a new class of recipients for state subsidized driver's licenses in Texas. He says that Texas would stand to lose millions of dollars if even a small fraction of DAPA eligible aliens applied.

"DAPA is an extraordinary assertion of executive power," Keller wrote in court papers. "The Executive has unilaterally crafted an enormous program -- one of the largest changes ever to our Nation's approach to immigration," he said. "In doing so, the Executive dispensed with immigration statutes by declaring unlawful conduct to be lawful."

He pointed to the guidance and said that the eligible undocumented immigrations would be permitted to be "lawfully present in the United States," which would make them eligible for work authorization and some types of Social Security and Medicare benefits.

Voces de la Frontera in Milwaukee issued this statement Thursday:

Today, the US Supreme Court deadlocked in a 4-4 split on President Obama’s executive actions on immigration, leaving in place a lower court ruling blocking the measures. The programs, known as Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), would have provided protection from deportation and 3-year work permits to some 5 million undocumented parents of US Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents, as well as undocumented people who came to the US before the age of 16. The decision does not affect the original DACA program, created in 2012.

President Obama had announced the actions in November 2014 following a campaign of protest and civil disobedience led by undocumented immigrants. Shortly afterward 26 Republican Governors and Attorneys General, including Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, filed suit to block the program.

“This means that all that is unjust about my situation will continue,” said Voces member Karla Cano, 21, a senior at Mount Mary University and mother of a 2-year-old son. Karla would have qualified for expanded DACA. “I am in college so I can have a career helping others, but I cannot start a career like that without work authorization. We just want to help this country and support our families like anyone else. I am not giving up on the struggle. We need more people to get involved in the upcoming elections because this decision shows the importance of both the presidential and US congressional elections and whom the next President will nominate to the U.S. Supreme Court."

“This is very sad for me,” said José Flores, a factory worker and father of 4 who is the President of Voces de la Frontera. “I have been waiting and fighting for a reform like DAPA for years, but we are not giving up. I refuse to be afraid, to shrink back into the shadows. Our community has to keep fighting. We have to make sure that pro-immigrant candidates win in November so that we can move immigration reform through the US Congress. We have to keep fighting. The Latino vote in Wisconsin will be decisive and we will remember in November, who stood with us and who stood against our families.”


  • Michael Neils

    So 26 states challenged and blocked the plan. Majority rules. There’s no reason for illegals to enjoy all the benefits and “freedom”. None. If you want to enjoy those benefits, become a legal citizen. Like in the olden days; you know the country we once were that POTUS keeps referring to? Where people immigrated to USA, with papers of good health, and papers to work. They became legal citizens. They learned ENGLISH. They were not given any special treatment.

  • Libsareliars

    Please Obama can you immigrate to a different country? You are irrelevant and no one cares what comes out of your big mouth.

  • Jim

    So why didn’t he pass an immigration bill the first two years he was in office when the Dems held a majority in Congress?
    To busy pushing Obamacare down our throats & immigration was a political suicide for the next election of congress.

  • Clemenza

    the left has become really unhinged. They are running around thinking everything is fine spending the taxpayers money on socialist baloney. Time to cut all welfare and let everyone migrate back to the hell they came from. Build the damn wall and add some .50 gatling guns every 100 feet see how many miscreants make it through before they get evaporated. All the hard working good illegals should start paying taxes immediately and register to vote republican.

  • Roth

    Looks like another win in the Baltimore verdict. BLM mayor and prosecutors should all resign and pay reparations to the black officer that was wrongfully charged. Social justice warriors loose again, good guys win.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.