Hub for reliable, timely news about COVID-19 pandemic

DOJ appeals judge’s ruling that temporarily blocks President Donald Trump’s order on refugees

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

PALM BEACH, FL - FEBRUARY 03: U.S. President Donald Trump walks down the steps as he arrives on Air Force One at the Palm Beach International Airport for a visit to his Mar-a-Lago Resort for the weekend on February 3, 2017 in Palm Beach, Florida. President Donald Trump is on his first visit to Palm Beach since his inauguration. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Saturday appealed a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that stopped enforcement of the executive order banning travel to the US from seven Muslim-majority countries and suspending refugee entry to the US.

The order by Judge James Robart, a George W. Bush appointee who presides in Washington state, is a significant setback for Trump’s controversial travel ban and creates another round of chaos nationwide over the policy’s legality.

“The court concludes that the circumstances brought before it today are such that it must intervene to fulfill its constitutional role in our tripartite government,” Robart wrote in the order.

1) Who is Judge Robart?

James L. Robart has been a federal judge in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington state since 2004, the year after Bush nominated him to the federal bench. He assumed senior status in 2016.

Born in 1947 in Seattle, Robart graduated in 1969 from Whitman College and in 1973 from Georgetown Law School, where he was administrative editor of the Georgetown Law Journal, according to his official biography on the US District Court’s website. He was in private practice in Seattle with the firm Lane Powell Moss & Miller from 1973 to 2004, serving as managing partner in 2003 and 2004.

2) Robart has done extensive community service

During his confirmation hearing, Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington praised Robart for his “generous sense of community service through his work with at-risk and special needs youth.”

Robart is the former president and trustee of the Seattle Children’s Home, which handles mental health needs for children and their families throughout the city and state, according to its website. He’s also worked extensively with the Children’s Home Society of Washington, which provides services to families to improve children’s lives.

3) This is not the first time he’s been in the news

Robart sparked controversy last year for a remark he made from the bench involving a case alleging use of excessive force by police.

According to a video posted on the federal court’s website, Robart said “black lives matter” during a court hearing in August 2016. Citing FBI statistics, he said, “Police shootings resulting in deaths involved 41% black people, despite being only 20% of the population living in those cities.”

“Forty-one percent of the casualties, 20% people of the population — black lives matter,” Robart said.

The remark came during testimony in 2012 lawsuit filed by the Obama administration against the Seattle Police Department. The Department of Justice wanted the police force to change certain policies after an investigation found “reasonable cause to believe that SPD had engaged in a pattern or practice of excessive force.” The DOJ report also identified “serious concerns about certain practices that could have a disparate impact on minority communities.”

4) He’s done pro bono work with Southeast Asian refugees

During his confirmation hearing, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah noted that Robart had done pro bono legal work and had represented refugees during his career.

“He has been active in the representation of the disadvantaged through his work with Evergreen Legal Services and the independent representation of Southeast Asian refugees,” Hatch said.

Robart was confirmed unanimously by the Senate.

5) Helping people with ‘immediate needs’ and ‘immediate problems’

It was also during his confirmation hearing that Robart spoke about using the courts to help people who felt disenfranchised.

“I was introduced to people who in many times felt that the legal system was stacked against them or was unfair,” he said. “And one of the things, I think, that my time there helped accomplish was to show them that the legal system was set up for their benefit and that it could be, if properly used, an opportunity for them to seek redress if they had been wronged.”

Robart added that he would treat everyone in his courtroom with “dignity and respect.”

“Working with people who have an immediate need and an immediate problem that you are able to help with is the most satisfying aspect of the practice of law. I think in terms of — if I am fortunate enough to be confirmed by the Senate, I will take that experience to the courtroom with me, recognize that you need to treat everyone with dignity and with respect, and to engage them so that when they leave the courtroom they feel like they had a fair trial.”


  • Huh !

    This judge is confusing Civil Rights with Human Rights, they are different ….CIVIL RIGHTS = Personal liberties that belong to an individual, owing to his or her status as a citizen or resident of a particular country or community. The most common legal application of the term civil rights involves the rights guaranteed to U.S. citizens and residents by legislation and by the Constitution ….. HUMAN RIGHTS = Basic rights that fundamentally and inherently belong to each individual. Human rights are freedoms established by custom or international agreement that impose standards of conduct on all nations ….That being said, we should allow our citizens and legal residents, despite their lineage, to come home !

  • grunt

    The judge is obviously a radical.
    On another note, CNN ever mentions when an activist judge was appointed by Barack Hussein Obama when thy legislate from the bench.

  • lovin2017sofar

    It makes me laugh that death to Americans is the cry from a lot of these places but oh what?! free food, housing, medical care AND I can keep practicing my religion? Hi let me in no need to vet me,i umm i have family here.

  • Gregg

    This judge is putting himself in the hot seat because, if something happens and there is a breach in our nation’s security, he could be personally held liable by Homeland Security for any deaths that occur because of blocking the travel ban

  • Opinion8d

    Typical news bias……what does it matter ‘who’ the judge is?!?! Judges are supposed to uphold the EXISTING laws, not base their decisions on their personal experiences or how they feel. I’m tired of how the MSG continues to refer to this as a ‘muslim ban’ -it’s not. It’s halting the process until the process of vetting can be reviewed. These are all Countries that don’t have a functioning central govt. (except IRAN -which simply chants ‘death to America’) -how do you vet someone when records don’t exist?? This judge ruled based on activism, not the rule of law!!!

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.