President Trump: “I suggested a month (delay)” before executive order on immigration; was told no

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Journalists called out a White House claim that news outlets are failing to adequately report terror attacks. On Monday, Feb 6, 2017 the White House issued a list of 78 terror attacks to underscore US President Donald Trump's assertion that the media is failing to adequately report them.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump — even as he blasted lawyers contesting his immigration executive order — detailed for the first time Wednesday, February 8th his own hesitations about the controversial plan before it was signed.

President Trump, speaking to law enforcement officials in Washington, said he argued before the order was finalized for giving travelers a month’s notice before cutting off entry to the US.

But he said he was overruled by law enforcement officials, who he didn’t name, alleging the delay could prompt a flood of dangerous terrorists into the country — an explanation that failed to account for the lengthy process of obtaining a US visa or applying for refugee status.

“The law enforcement people said to me, ‘Oh, you can’t give a notice,’ ” President Trump said at a conference for the Major Cities Chiefs Association. “I suggested a month. And I said, ‘What about a week?’ They said you can’t do that because then people are gonna pour in before the toughness.”

It was a surprising admission, given the President’s full-throated defense of his travel ban. He even tweeted Sunday after a judge suspended its implementation: “Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!”

President Trump also insisted his administration properly went about enacting the order, which bars citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US for 90 days, all refugees for 120 days and indefinitely halts refugees from Syria.

“We do things well. We did things right,” President Trump told the sheriffs. “It’s as plain as you can have it.”

In the week-and-a-half since President Trump signed the contentious order, he’s expressed no public reservations about its preparation or consequences, amid skepticism and protests. Even some of President Trump’s political allies bemoaned the rollout, which was drafted by a tight circle of President Trump’s aides with little input from lawmakers or the federal agencies who would ultimately be responsible for enforcing it.

In defending his administration, President Trump tweeted last week that advance warning on who the order would ban could have led to a flood of migrants into the US.

“If the ban were announced with a one week notice, the ‘bad’ would rush into our country during that week. A lot of bad ‘dudes’ out there!” President Trump tweeted on January 30, without noting he’d expressed his own thoughts on delaying the ban before the order was signed.

The White House didn’t respond Wednesday when asked which law enforcement people advised President Trump against giving advance notice of his impending order.

Their claim that such a move would encourage waves of immigration doesn’t match the realities of obtaining a US visa, which can take months and wouldn’t allow such a rush of migrants. Procedures already in place require the citizens of the seven countries on the administration’s list to undergo background checks and intelligence reviews before obtaining permission to enter the US.

Refugees must also undergo lengthy vetting before being allowed to enter the US for resettlement.

But White House press secretary Sean Spicer said last week that delaying the order could place the country at risk.

“Everyone’s saying, ‘Well how did you have to go today? Why couldn’t you have waited another day?’ We don’t know when the next threat faces this country. We don’t know when the next terrorist is going to enter this country. We don’t know when the next bomb’s going to go off,” Spicer said during a forum at George Washington University. “The last thing that you want to do is to say, ‘Well, we could’ve done this Saturday, but we waited one more day.’ ”

Speaking before Congress Tuesday, Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly suggested the rollout of the immigration restrictions could have been eased by greater transparency ahead of time.

“In retrospect, I should have — and this is all on me, by the way — I should have delayed it just a bit so I could talk to members of Congress,” he told the House Homeland Security Committee. “The thinking was to get it out quick so that potentially people that might be coming here to harm us would not take advantage of some period of time they could jump on an airplane and get here.”

In his speech on Wednesday, President Trump didn’t explain his reasoning in raising a month-long delay on the ban. The executive order, which he signed at the Pentagon on January 27, contends the restrictions on travel are necessary while US security agencies review vetting measures on travelers and enact more stringent requirements. The President didn’t specify whether that review would also have been delayed.

1 Comment

  • John Kennedy

    And the outright lies continue to passionate delight of his supporters. The question now becomes when the lies start to affect them, will their passion be so delightful?

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.