Warren says she won’t be silent about Sessions’ ‘radical hatred’

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Elizabeth Warren, the liberal Massachusetts Democrat, was told she violated Senate rules against impugning another senator. She was reading a letter by Coretta Scott King from 1986 opposing Jeff Sessions. Credit: warren.senate.gov

Sen. Elizabeth Warren tore into Jeff Sessions Wednesday night, saying she and her colleagues would oppose the Alabama politician’s “radical hatred” as he moved to lead President Donald Trump’s Justice Department.

The Massachusetts Democrat galvanized her party Tuesday night when she went to the Senate floor to read a 1986 letter from Coretta Scott King denouncing Sessions as a racist. Senate Republicans invoked a rule against “impugning” a fellow senator during debate to bar Warren from the remainder of the Senate discussion over Sessions.

Sessions and his supporters have fiercely denied accusations that he is racist.

She continued her case against Sessions from outside the Senate, and after his confirmation, she rattled off several tweets condemning him.

“There’s no Rule 19 to silence me from talking about Jeff Sessions anymore. So let me say loudly & clearly: This is just the beginning,” she said in one tweet, referencing the Senate rule invoked to bar her from the debate.

“And you better believe every Senator who voted to put Jeff Sessions’s radical hatred into @TheJusticeDept will hear from all of us, too,” Warren said.

Rep. Barbara Lee, a progressive Democrat from California, offered a similar sentiment in the wake of the Sessions vote.

“I will oppose any attempt by AG Sessions, the Justice Department & the Administration to turn back the clock on our constitutional rights,” Lee tweeted.

Progressive organizations also chimed in.

“Sessions is a dire threat to our civil rights,” Lambda Legal, a nonprofit legal organization that advocates for LGBT rights, said in a statement.

The liberal think tank Center for American Progress warned about Sessions’ closeness with ¬†PresidentTrump: “There is no reason to think that Attorney General Sessions will act as an independent check on the President.”

The reaction to Sessions confirmation in some ways reflected the staunch opposition he faced. However, he did ultimately get confirmed, and after setting his resignation for just before the end of the day Wednesday, Sessions was set to assume his new office on Thursday.

“Tomorrow @POTUS will swear in @SenatorSessions as our nation’s next Attorney General,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer tweeted.


  • grunt

    Don’t they realize that when you call everyone a radical or a racist, people stop taking you seriously?
    On an unrelated note, didn’t Sen. Warren claim to be Native American even though she isn’t?

  • John

    Isn’t this the same guy that received an award from the NAACP for bankrupting the KKK in Alabama. Now he’s a racist??

  • Jim

    And she takes her orders from an old hag that thinks Busch is still president and another that thinks Russia has invaded Korea!!

  • Scott

    With all due respect to Ms. King, this letter is over 30 years old and the opinion of one person. It’s irrelevance in this decision cannot be emphasized enough and is pretty clear evidence that the Dems have nothing else to whine about. #youdorealizehowbadthepriorAGwas,right?

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.