Wisconsin DOJ rape kit tests yield charges against 6 people

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

MADISON — The Wisconsin Department of Justice’s years of work analyzing thousands of untested sexual assault kits has generated charges against a half-dozen people so far, according to data the agency released Friday.

Democratic state Attorney General Josh Kaul said in an interview he expects more charges to materialize as investigators pour over the results in the coming months, but he cautioned that they’re basically pursuing cold cases and need time.

“It’s absolutely worthwhile the state did this,” he said. “The bottom line is survivors of sexual assault deserve to have their cases investigated.”

Tens of thousands of sexual assault evidence kits have gone untested in the United States for a variety of reasons. A prosecutor may have decided a case was too weak to pursue or been forced to drop cases because victims wouldn’t cooperate. Victim advocate groups have been pushing since 2014 for states to analyze the kits anyway in the hopes of identifying serial offenders.

In 2015, then-Republican Attorney General Brad Schimel received a $4 million federal grant to start testing Wisconsin’s cases. He started testing in 2016 and announced last September that the DOJ had finished testing about 4,100 kits.

Kaul hammered Schimel during the campaign last summer for taking too long to finish the testing, accusing him of delaying justice for sexual assault victims. He narrowly defeated Schimel in November.

Kaul’s administration released extensive data updating the status of the project as of Thursday.

According to the figures, the DOJ identified nearly 7,000 untested kits across the state and decided to test 4,471 of them. Testing has been completed on 4,160 kits.

The tests have detected DNA in 1,605 kits and analysts were able to obtain enough DNA from 998 of those to upload to CODIS, the FBI’s national DNA database. DNA from those 998 kits generated 580 “hits,” or matches to known or unknown profiles already in the database.

A DOJ team working with local police departments is reviewing 605 cases stemming from the 1,605 kits that had detectable DNA. Thus far, those efforts have led to charges against six people in Milwaukee, Oneida, Rock, Winnebago and Waupaca counties. Four people were charged in 2018, before Kaul took office. Local Milwaukee prosecutors charged the fifth person in February and charged the sixth person, 44-year-old Cedric Ball, on Friday.

According to the criminal complaint in that case, a woman told police Ball paid her $10 for sex in 2014 but held her down and refused to stop.

The woman underwent a sexual assault exam the same day. Her evidence kit was placed in the Milwaukee Police Department’s inventory and later tested as part of the DOJ project. DNA from swabs in the kit matched Ball’s profile in CODIS this past September.

DOJ spokeswoman Gillian Drummond declined to comment on why her kit wasn’t tested sooner, saying the matter is an ongoing case. Online court records didn’t list an attorney for Ball.

Asked why the project has yielded charges against six people in four years, Kaul said many of the test results didn’t come back until 2018.

He added that the review of the 605 cases is ongoing and that the DOJ also plans to look into the remaining 1,000 cases with new DNA. Once a DNA profile is in CODIS, it’s there forever and could serve as a key clue in solving some future crime, he said.

Kaul cautioned that it takes time to develop evidence, especially in cases that could be years old. The statute of limitations comes into play, the DNA might not be helpful in a case in which the defendant is known and the only question is whether the sex was consensual, and victims have to be found and may not want to pursue charges, he said.

He noted that the project is funded almost entirely by federal grants. The only resource the DOJ has expended is time spent applying for the grants and conducting the case reviews.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.