Stay issued: Right-to-work law back in effect; lawyer for groups suing vows to fight on

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

MADISON -- Wisconsin's right-to-work law is back in effect. This, as the lawyer for the groups suing the state over the law vows to fight on.

A state appeals court in Wausau issued a stay, halting a Dane County judge's decision to toss out Wisconsin's right-to-work law. In effect, it puts the law back in place.

Right-to-Work

Right-to-Work

Rick Esenberg

Rick Esenberg

"It removes uncertainty," Attorney Rick Esenberg said.

Esenberg and other conservatives say businesses negotiating new union contracts will do so knowing the right-to-work law is in effect.

The law says people can work at union shops without paying dues to the union.

Conservatives say it's good for business and for workers -- but unions say less representation will drive down wages and make workplaces less safe.

The appeals court said it wanted to "avoid confusion" by keeping right-to-work in force, and it also said the law enjoys a "presumption of constitutionality."

"It`s temporary -- just until the court makes a final decision on the merits," Attorney Fred Perillo said.

Fred Perillo

Fred Perillo

Perillo represents three unions fighting the law.

"It`s interesting that the court found that a loss of tens of thousands of dollars is not significant harm, but that was the court`s decision, and we`re prepared to move on and talk about the big issue," Perillo said.

When that happens, Esenberg expects the law to remain in effect. He says the earlier ruling was simply an outlier.

"The value of the stay is that it makes clear that the decision of one trial court in one county in Wisconsin doesn`t set precedent. It`s not the final word," Esenberg said.

This case is expected to go all the way to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and has a good chance of remaining in effect.

Conservatives hold a 5-2 advantage there.

This case is a long way from its conclusion.

Attorneys expect arguments in the appeals court to happen this fall.

Right-to-Work

3 comments

  • Michael Neils

    “It`s interesting that the court found that a loss of tens of thousands of dollars is not significant harm, but that was the court`s decision, and we`re prepared to move on and talk about the big issue,” Perillo said. Well I find THAT interesting. To me this means the unions loss of dues-If the unions meant these so called lower wages for the thousands of workers, wouldn’t his remark have been hundreds of thousands of dollars? 500 workers x $60 a month for 12 months in union dues is $360,000. 500 workers going from $20 hour to $15 would be a $5,200,000 loss of wages ($5 hour on a 40 hour week at a 52 week run).Shouldn’t THAT be the unions concern? lol

  • computertech

    Why are you lying about the true name of the bill? We already have the right to be hire. The bill adds the right to be FIRED for ZERO reason. Ask for a raise, legally able to FIRE you. try to make a union, able to FIRE you. Not have sex with the boss, perfectly legal to FIRE you.
    Notice the states with the the RIGHT TO FIRE laws also have the lowest incomes for the middle/poor classes.

Comments are closed.