WSJ Report: Gov. Walker may be ready to cut a deal with prosecutors

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

MILWAUKEE (WITI) -- The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), citing anonymous sources, reports that Gov. Scott Walker may be ready to cut a deal with prosecutors. That deal would end the second John Doe investigation.

That investigation is looking into the possibility that Gov. Walker's campaign broke the law by coordinating with outside political groups like the Wisconsin Club for Growth, during the 2012 recall election.

"I think to the outsider looking at this, it's not surprising that Governor Walker's campaign might be interested in ending this investigation," said Jay Heck, Executive Director of Common Cause Wisconsin, a non-partisan group that advocates for good government. "This is after all, an election year, and if this is strung out over the summer and into the fall, it's probably not helpful to Walker."

But the reports of a possible deal have upset Walker's allies -- like those in the Club for Growth, who say the entire investigation is a witch hunt. Those groups were encouraged when U.S. District Judge Rudolph Randa stopped the investigation, saying it violated the First Amendment.

A WSJ editorial published on Tuesday, May 27th said: "The understandable concern among the direct targets of the John Doe is that Mr. Biskupic will cut a deal that would exonerate Mr. Walker while wrestling concessions from some of Mr. Walker's allies. "...Sounds like Mr. Walker has to decide whose side he's on--his own, or the larger principles he claims to represent."

Speaking to reporters in New Berlin on Wednesday, Gov. Walker said he could not discuss the case because of the secrecy order.

"As I pointed out before, the bottom line is, per the law, people who know anything about it are prohibited from talking about it, and people who don't know anything about it shouldn't be talking about it. So either way I don't talk about it," said Gov. Walker

"What is interesting are the very groups -- Club for Growth, the Wall Street Journal --  which have always strongly favored Governor Walker have sort of said, 'Well, no.  Don't settle, let's take this all the way through to its conclusion," said Heck.

The WSJ editorial had a harsh warning for Gov. Walker: "Mr. Walker is a hero to many for his fight against public unions, but he will tarnish that image if he sells out the cause for some short-term re-election reassurance."

"It's going to be a political issue in the Fall whether Governor Walker settles it or not," said Heck.

The investigation is on hold right now because of Judge Randa's order. Prosecutors have appealed to the 7th Circuit in Chicago. In the meantime, neither prosecutors nor Walker's campaign are speaking on the record about a potential deal.

 

8 comments

  • Daniel J

    There will be NO deal nor settlement as there is NOTHING to settle about! The LEFT constantly pushes this propaganda and the DEAD-TREE “WJS” attempts to sell it! Aranda had made his decision…the TRUTH wins over the socialists. CAZE CLISED! HA!

    • Karen

      Well, there must be something there if they want to work out a deal and not fight it. People don’t do deals if they’re innocent. It’s too close to election time, and they want it swept under the rug quickly.

  • WorldCrimePrevention

    Everybody knows that Governor Scott Walker is crooked & dirty… otherwise why would he be taking a deal. The only Time that people take a deal is when they are Guilty… with the exception of Lawrencia Bembenek who took a deal because she was set up by The Milwaukee Police & The D.A.’s office. In her last appeal, they even said that she did not do it but they would jot reverse the conviction because she took a deal knowing that she was going to get screwed. Technically because she is innocent & it was proven that she was innocent, the case has to be reopened because it is unsolved.

    In this this case with Scott Walker, he is Guilty.

    • What!

      Bahahaha! Liberals just nag and nag and nag til they get what they want. In this witch hunt they were trying to drag it on til the election even though they know they will never find anything, they’re just trying to discredit this great Governor because it’s all these turds have. They took right up the rectum in the recall. Again, BAHAHAHA!

  • Matt

    #1 No deal is being cut, this would be a violation of Judge Randa’s orders.

    #2 The deal in question is the liberal prosecution approaching Walkers attorneys, against Judges orders (surprise liberals breaking the law AGAIN), to cut a deal and save face so the prosecution is not subject to an punitive repercussions when the John Doe is closed. After all, the prosecution ILLEGALLY violated Walker and his contributors rights and if they dont cut a deal could face charges themselves, lose their jobs, and worst (doubt it will happen) face jail time. Without the deal, prosecutors would also have to give up the names of all their sources, WHOOPS…

    Sounds to me like the prosecution is in full blown cover-up mode and they dont care if they violate judges orders and are held in contempt!

Comments are closed.