LIVE: The House Judiciary Committee’s latest impeachment hearing

State considers two options for rebuilding Stadium interchange, stretch of I-94

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Data pix.

MILWAUKEE (WITI) -- The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) has narrowed the number of options for rebuilding the Stadium Interchange in Milwaukee. There are just two on the table now -- and a state transportation official tells FOX6 News the two choices were made after lengthy environmental impact statements were completed.

The controversial plans would reconstruct I-94 near the Stadium Interchange  -- and it comes with a hefty price tag; one that could top $1 billion -- mostly from federal funds. For a three-and-a-half mile project, it's had more than a little opposition.

One of the most contested plans is now on the front burner. A two-level, double-deck highway is being considered. The state says the primary reason this is a good option is because the freeway winds between two cemeteries. This option would allow no graves to be disturbed.

The other proposal keeps I-94 at a surface level with 11-foot wide lanes -- narrower than most. The off-ramps would be changed as well -- making access to the Menomonee Valley and Potawatomi Hotel and Casino more difficult.

"That money can be used in fixing potholes. that money can be used to fix our common streets and common highways," said Juan Carlos Ruiz, a member of the group Coalition for Responsible Transportation.

Ruiz has been active in protesting the freeway expansion. He calls it a waste of money -- and urges the government to spend the funds on existing streets and mass transit. Ruiz says his group is fine-tuning its own alternative plan to present.

As for WisDOT's plans, Ruiz said, "It's divided our communities. It's not good for our neighborhoods, not good for businesses. And the other option they are giving us is not going a long with the transportation system in the country. We need better transportation."

Any plan that is ultimately approved would have to go to the State Legislature for state funding approval. The first shovel wouldn't go into the ground until 2019.

CLICK HERE to read more about the state's plans from the Milwaukee Business Journal.

4 comments

  • PATTI GREEN

    WHY ARENT THEY BUILDING THIS WHERE SO I CAN GET TO MY HOUSE? WHY DO THEY ALWAYS BUILD THE INTERSTATES AROUND THE STADIUM? AND THEN THE BUCKS ARE JUST GOING TO TARE THE STADIUM DOWN AND BUILD THEMSELVES A NEW ONE ANYWAY.. THEY NEVER SPEND MY TAX DOLLARS ON MY NEEDS.

  • JokeEnthusiast

    No great options for an area so densley packed as that area is. Narrower lanes would be the better of the two for the people that live around there (I for one wouldn’t wanna live next to a double decker freeway and I find it cute how Fox didn’t mention that as a downside). The concern for the dead and buried is great and all, but the living that are going to be affected by this should be equally considered.

    So what if it’s a little harder for people to go and gamble (remember when people thought gambling was a bad thing?).

    Cities across the state are struggling with rebuilding their local road infrastructure, it would be nice if the State helped more in that regard (I won’t hold my breath).

  • Deb Ward (@DebWard628)

    they need to stop wasting our money…fix the streets like Ruiz said…they have been waiting forever…let Potawatomi dish in some money if they want easy access for people to spend all their welfare money….yes, it is FACT…I know many who go down there as soon as they get “paid”…and stop tearing down or tearing up streets and buildings that are not that old.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.