Fond du Lac homicide, man gets life in prison for 2021 shooting
FOND DU LAC, Wis. - A Fond du Lac man has been sentenced to life in prison for a 2021 fatal shooting that unfolded amid an armed robbery.
Julius Freeman, 24, was found guilty at trial in July of first-degree intentional homicide and armed robbery. Court records indicate he'll be eligible for extended supervision after serving 35 years behind bars.
Freeman was charged along with 29-year-old Eric Perry in the case. Perry is scheduled to go to trial, facing the same two felony charges, next year.
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
Case details
Fond du Lac police were called to a home near 8th and Lexington the night of Oct. 17, 2021. The victim, a 26-year-old man, was dead at the scene with an apparent gunshot wound to the head.
A criminal complaint states a witness awoke and saw two people she did not know running out of her house and found the victim "in a pool of blood." The witness said the two people got into the backseat of a green SUV that drove off.
Investigators determined the victim had a gun and more than $600 cash at the time of his death. After searching the home, however, the gun and cash were not found.
Three days after the shooting, on Oct. 20, 2021, a woman reported a stolen gun to police. The gun in question was the one missing from the homicide scene, per the complaint. The woman said she had bought the gun with the victim at an Appleton sporting goods store. Surveillance from the store showed the woman and the victim together when the gun was purchased on Oct. 11 – six days before the homicide. As of May 24, 2022, the complaint states, the gun had not been found.
According to the complaint, in the days after the shooting, police received reports from people saying "Lil E" or "Eric" – later determined to be Perry – was responsible for the shooting.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX6 News app for iOS or Android.
Police records, the complaint states, listed a license plate number associated with Perry from "multiple" contacts with law enforcement. That license plate number was registered to a green SUV, but Perry was not the registered owner.
In January, police spoke to a man who told police he heard through "word on the streets" that Perry and Freeman were involved in the victim's killing. The witness said he spoke to Perry the night of the shooting, according to the complaint, and that Perry said he was looking to "hit a lick" – meaning to get money fast, usually by robbing someone.
Police asked a woman in February 2022 about a message she sent Freeman the day after the shooting asking about "pants that he bleached the blood off of." The woman said Freeman told her Perry shot the victim in the head, but she did not know if it was true, and that's how the blood got on his pants. She said she saw Perry wiping a gun down, and "figured something went down," per the complaint.
Searches and evidence
Police executed a search warrant at an address associated with Perry the week after the shooting. There, officers found $600 cash and noted the serial numbers on the bills.
During the investigation, the complaint states investigators found a Snapchat video recorded the night of the homicide. The video started with the victim placing $100 bills on a counter; based on the items and background seen in the video, the video was determined to have been filmed at the homicide scene.
The serial numbers were visible in the video on two of the $100 bills. Those serial numbers matched two of the serial numbers on the bills found during the search of the address associated with Perry, the complaint states.
Police went through some of Freeman's clothing as part of the investigation, which included several pairs of distressed jeans that looked bleached. One of those pairs "appeared to not have been distressed at the manufacturer." The pants had a "dirty brown area" and about a dozen "red stains." The jeans were sent to the state crime lab in Madison.
In April, the crime lab report on Freeman's jeans found two people's DNA. It found the victim was the "source" of a "major" component in samples taken from the jeans' red stain. The second person's DNA was deemed "not suitable for comparisons."